American midterms: mega-donors play a disproportionate role in the most expensive cycle in history
The 20 biggest donors total about $2 billion in federal disputes, according to InfoMoney, with data from AdImpact and The New York Times.
BY THE X-TRADER NEWS NEWSROOM · REPORTING FROM INFOMONEY · 2 MIN
The US midterm election cycle is described as the most expensive in history for political advertising, and a disproportionate share of that money comes from a narrow group of donors. According to InfoMoney, hundreds of millions of dollars have already entered the political system since August, the month in which The New York Times published the latest ranking of the 20 largest donors.
The new ranking must continue until the contributions deadline in mid-October, which allows you to monitor the evolution of donations in the final weeks of the dispute. According to the report, the 20 largest donors total around US$2 billion in federal disputes throughout the cycle.
This value is equivalent to approximately 15% of all expected ad spending in the cycle, according to AdImpact, a media monitoring company that provided the ad spending data used in the report. The company estimates that mega-donors play a disproportionate role in the most expensive election in advertising since at least 2018.
The concentration draws attention because whoever finances such a large portion of the ads tends to have weight in the campaign debate. This is a reading, not accurate data: the numbers show the financial weight, not the effect it will have on votes or decisions.
The individual names of the mega-donors are not included in the data that supports this article, which is based on the totals released by the survey.
What changes for the investor
For those who follow the stock market, Nasdaq, interest rates and the dollar, the central point is political uncertainty. When a large share of electoral financing is concentrated in a few names, the outcome of the dispute can influence issues such as taxation, regulation and public spending, which affect risk appetite and asset prices. This is a possible channel of effect, not a prediction of price movement. As a liberal and center-right newspaper, The
Automatically translated from Portuguese.
